911: US Security Lapse Or The CIA’s Greatest Hit?

Sep
2011
08

posted by on , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Was 911 a false flag operation designed to win public support for the war on terror?

911: Security Lapse Or The CIA’s Greatest Hit?

By Jon King

A Madman In A Cave

911: Security Lapse Or The CIA’s Greatest Hit? It’s at this time of year, as we approach the 10th anniversary of perhaps the biggest false flag operation ever to have been conducted, that the corporate media put out their cover stories on 911—on how America once came under fire from Islamic extremists directed by a madman from a cave in Afghanistan.

This year being the tenth anniversary, of course, the media stories are even more emotive, reminding us all of the heartbreak and the heroism of that fateful day, while the mainstream TV programmes – in particular National Geographic’s vomit-inducing 911 Interview with George W and the BBC’s banal (if not bizarre) The Twins of the Twin Towers (sounds like an 80s Soap Opera, doesn’t it?) – could have been written by Hollywood’s finest scriptwriters. Probably were.

But be that as it may, anyone who has even so much as glanced at the facts knows too only well that the abovementioned ‘ madman in a cave’ was not mad at all.

His name was Osama Bin Laden and he was a long-term CIA agent with powerful allies in the US banking and oil industries.

Even a conservative evaluation of the facts surrounding 911 reveals that, if Osama Bin Laden had anything at all to do with 911, it was that he was set up as the patsy in an operation fated to become the CIA’s greatest hit.

One reason, perhaps, that this son of a Saudi Sheikh and construction magnate remained alive and on the run (allegedly) for the best part of ten years, before being tracked down and murdered in a walled-off country house just a few miles from Islamabad, Pakistan—where (allegedly) he’d been living with his wife and kids.

And more’s the point: perhaps this is also why, in January 2001, then-President George W Bush ordered that CIA investigations into the Bin Laden family’s alleged connections to terrorism should cease forthwith.

George W new well enough, of course, that Osama Bin Laden’s connection to terrorism began and ended with his family’s business relationship with the Bush family and their stake in the Washington DC-based Carlyle Group.

The Bin Laden’s were, lest we forget, guests in the US on the day of 911.

911: Security Lapse Or The CIA’s Greatest Hit?

Science And Conspiracy And New Momentum

But does this prove 911 was an inside job?

Perhaps not. But it does go a long way in convincing me to scrutinize the evidence for myself rather than accept the bullshit explanations regurgitated each year by the CIA and its corporate media outlets, this year even more so.

Last year we were treated to National Geographic’s propaganda piece, 911: Science And Conspiracy, a pseudo-scientific whitewash of any evidence implicating the CIA and the US government in the 911 conspiracy.

And as mentioned above, this year’s special offering is a ‘candid’ interview with George W Bush, no less. Having had a full decade to learn his lines it’s a chance for Dubbya to finally silence the doubters and at the same time whip up nationalistic fervour sufficient to lend new momentum to the ‘war on terror’—which, after all, is what 911 was all about in the first place, wasn’t it?

No doubt there will be other, equally propagandist offerings in the lead up to this week’s anniversary of the event—an event which must surely go down in history as, not only the CIA’s greatest hit, but perhaps the most pernicious and deadly conspiracy ever perpetrated on the American people, bar none.

911: Security Lapse Or The CIA’s Greatest Hit?

The Top Twenty Questions

So much has been written about 911 it seems there really is little more to be said, at least until the following questions are met with satisfactory answers:

  • 1. Why did the towers collapse as though brought down in a controlled demolition?
  • 2. Why weren’t military jets scrambled to intercept the hijacked aircraft before they could reach their target?
  • 3. Why are there no images of the ‘plane’ said to have crashed into the Pentagon? What really hit the Pentagon?
  • 4. What caused Building 7 to collapse on the afternoon of September 11th, 2001, again as though by controlled demolition?

  • 5. How could George Bush have seen the first plane hit, as he later claimed?
  • 6. On being informed of the attacks, why wasn’t George Bush ushered from the classroom immediately by his secret service men? Did they not think an attack on the World Trade Center was sufficient to disrupt the president’s schedule?
  • 7. What was George Bush doing in a classroom in Florida anyway? When was the trip organized and who organized it?

  • 8. How did Mohammed Atta’s passport survive the fireball, and then fall from the sky and land conveniently amongst the rubble, perfectly in tact? Was it really Atta’s passport? If not, whose was it and who found it?
  • 9. How is it Mohammed Atta’s passport was recovered from the aftermath when the ‘black box’ flight recorders were not? How is it the mysterious ‘passport’ survived a fireball so intensely hot that the towers’ steel structures were allegedly melted by it, along with the ‘black box’ flight recorders?
  • 10. Why was Mohammed Atta’s bag the only bag not to have been loaded onto the aircraft?
  • 11. Why would he have left such incriminating evidence in the bag, including a video on “how to fly planes”? Why would he have left his driving licence in a rental car? Was Mohammed Atta a CIA asset? Was he set up?
  • 12. How were all 19 ‘hijackers’ identified and named within 2 days of the event? How were their cars and other personal effects discovered so quickly? Why weren’t any of their names on the passenger lists? Were the hijackers part of a CIA cell?
  • 13. What really happened to United Flight 93?
  • 14. What was – is – the true extent of Osama Bin Laden’s relationship with the CIA?
  • 15. What was – is – the true extent of the Bin Laden family’s relationship with the Bush family?

  • 16. What was – is – the true extent of the relationship between Haliburton, UNOCAL, the Carlyle Group, the Bush-Cheney syndicate and the Bin Laden Group Inc?
  • 17. What was – is – the true extent of the relationship between the above-named partners and the CIA, the Pakistani Intelligence Service (ISI) and the Taliban in this context?
  • 18. How much have US oil and gas companies profited from 911?
  • 19. How much have US arms companies profited from 911?
  • 20. Who was responsible for purchasing unprecedented quantities of put options in the companies most adversely affected by the attacks? Which US banks and corporations profited from 911?

And perhaps the sixty-four-thousand-dollar question: Was 911 an inside job—a false flag operation designed to win public support for the pre-planned war on terror?

Was 911 a security lapse or the CIA’s greatest hit?

Sadly, I think the evidence speaks for itself.

● ● ●

● ● ●

More here: “911 Truth”:http://www.911truth.org/ • “Pilots For 911 Truth”:http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/ • “Scholars For 911 Truth”:http://911scholars.org/ • “Scholars For 911 Truth 2”:http://stj911.org/ • “Veterans For 911 Truth”:http://v911t.org/ • “Firefighters For 911 Truth”:http://firefightersfor911truth.org/.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

main image: public domain

other images: “Patriot Saints”:http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/911/Conspiracy/Bush/ • “PA Joyner”:http://media.photobucket.com/image/osama%20bin%20laden/pajoyner/OsamabinLaden.jpg • “Israeli News Agency”:http://www.israelnewsagency.com/ • “Class Brain”:http://www.classbrain.com/ • “Illuminati News”:http://www.illuminati-news.com/

Leave a Reply

News