Police 'doing their job' at the Battle of the Beanfield. Photo: Tim Malyon
Posted by Jon King on Aug 08, 2009
Battle of the Beanfield, June 21st, 1985, when counterculture died and the police state was born…
A Stark And Bloody Symbol
“What we – the ITN camera crew and myself as a reporter – have seen in the last thirty minutes here in this field has been some of the most brutal police treatment of people that I’ve witnessed in my entire career as a journalist.
“The number of people who have been hit by policemen, who have been clubbed whilst holding babies in their arms in coaches around this field, is yet to be counted …There must surely be an inquiry after what has happened today”.
The above quote was taken from a report by ITN correspondent Kim Sabido, who was commenting on an event that took place on June 1st, 1985, in a field close to Stonehenge in Wiltshire.
The incident would come to be known as the Battle of the Beanfield, and would mark the day when counterculture finally died—our civil liberties and freedoms along with it.
Indeed, it was a stark and bloody symbol of the time in which it occurred.
The Thatcher Years
The ‘Thatcher Years’, as the 80s became known, marked a real turning point in the breakdown of counterculture and the establishment of the emerging New World Order. Perhaps a repercussion of the revolutionary 60s, and the equally anarchical 70s, the 1980s provided the perfect platform on which Orwellian Britain could finally be established.
And it was. Out went the Welfare State. In came Duran Duran, Big Brother and Jack Boots. It was almost as if, from nowhere it seemed, Fascism had become fashionable again.
Little surprise that out of this new political order the police state was born.
It was against this new, restrictive socio-political backdrop that a group of largely peaceful young people set off in convoy for the Stonehenge Free Festival (yes folks, festivals were FREE in those days!).
But the newly empowered police state had other ideas—in light of new legislation increasing police powers, and at the same time restricting social gatherings to a maximum of three, the police decided to have a festival of their own: psycho-style.
As the above report from Kim Sabido attests, no mercy was shown by this brave new police force, who set about trashing the convoy of ‘new age travellers’ and festival goers in a manner never before witnessed in Britain. Leastwise not in full public view.
As Nick Davies reported in The Observer at the time:
“There was glass breaking, people screaming, black smoke towering out of burning caravans and everywhere there seemed to be people being bashed and flattened and pulled by the hair … men, women and children were led away, shivering, swearing, crying, bleeding, leaving their homes in pieces.”


The report concluded: “Over the years I had seen all kinds of horrible and frightening things and always managed to grin and write it. But as I left the Beanfield, for the first time I felt sick enough to cry.”
The Big Green Gathering
Needless to say no inquiry was ever ordered into the Beanfield incident. But then this was the 1980s; inquiries were no longer in fashion. This was the decade of martial law—when travelling hippies, striking workers, anti-nuclear protestors et al came up against the new police state, and came off second best.
The Battle of the Beanfield perhaps enshrines this Dark Age better than any other singular event.
Even recent events at the 2009 G20 protests in London pale in the face of what happened that day, 24 years ago this summer. But we should not in any degree be comforted by this.
The fact that police acted in the way they did at the G20 march, and that police intelligence was behind the closure of the 2009 Big Green Gathering this week – itself an attempt to prevent environmental protestors gathering and protesting – is an ominous sign that almost a quarter of century on from the Battle of the Beanfield we still live in a police state.
Scarier still, most people have become so ‘institutionalized’ by it they no longer realize it’s there.
I’ll leave you with the words of Kim Sabido, a testament to how controlled the media had become back in the 1980s. And a warning that, if we think it’s any less so today, we’d best think again.
“When I got back to ITN during the following week and I went to the library to look at all the rushes, most of what I’d thought we’d shot was no longer there. From what I’ve seen of what ITN has provided since, it just disappeared, particularly some of the nastier shots.”
• • •
Are you old enough to remember the Battle of the Beanfield? Were you there? What do you think about the police state anyway?
Love to get your views…
__________________________________
image: Tim Malyon/Andy Worthington and Batrewick
Comments
Zion said...
The horrors that occured at the Stonehenge free festival in 1986 are repeated today at climate camp gatherings. The general media paints the climate movement in a bad light- on those rare occasions when it bothers to report on it at all. That’s because all large gatherings of people in society are feared by the powers that be, unless they are closely monitored, regulated and make plenty of cash for the men in charge. The violence at Kingsnorth climate camp in 2008 was as bad as the occurrences at G20, but there was very little news coverage and also little evidence as police confiscated cameras and mobiles with recording facilities. 2 years on and they have apologised: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2010/06/453272.html and those who kept their many search forms from the camp are filing compensation claims- I am unable to do this as I didn’t keep my claim forms: I left the camp in tears after 2 nights because I could no longer cope with witnessing any more mindless violence inflected by riot police upon such a peaceful, beautiful gathering of people.
And it’s not just happened at climate camp. As follow up to what has happened with the Big Green, Thatcher’s quote rang true at Sunrise Festival last week: I signed up to work with the Green Stewards on site for 5 days, but it turned out that my ‘green’ stewarding was mostly security work based on keeping people out of the festival and designed to divide people and keep present systems of hierarchy in place. Recently we lost Glade Festival because they can’t afford to pay all the security costs necessary for keeping the festival open. The CJA holds too much power over our right to gather, party, connect and coalate: this much was also obvious at Sunrise. The message was ‘put a foot wrong, be too alternative, and you’re over’, and the organisers have no choice but to follow that ‘advice’. We are so used to doing as we’re told that we’ve forgotten what society used to be like or could be like.. The younger generations don’t even know what a free festival or party is, let alone what it’s like to live without so much CCTV and internet monitoring and the CJA..
I’ve heard various ‘conspiracies’ before about the war on festivals, but through ‘green’ stewarding at Sunrise last week I learned just how laws are used against little festivals like Sunrise, and it really angers me that such beautiful alternative gatherings are under attack.. If it was a festival-wide thing then I wouldn’t be quite so angry but the fact is that I went to Reading Fest a few years ago and also the Big Chill last year, and the rules for them are very, very different to what Sunrise was put through. In fact I remember copious amounts of litter and fights breaking out at the Big Chill and Reading, at Reading Fest on the Saturday night people were throwing glass across the campsites and a friend of mine had to go to hospital because alcohol spilled in his eye because of it, however Reading Fest has not been shut down. Compare this to Sunrise Festival last week, where they had to put security ‘green’ stewards like myself on the door to check people’s bags for glass bottles.. It was like climate camp all over again.. And complete nonsense as you could actually buy glass things inside the festival. People actually throw bottles at each other at Reading Fest and they haven’t been shut down, but then they’re corporate money machines not alternative-lifestyle ‘convoys’, aren’t they?
My opinion? We have the right to gather, connect, party and coalate For Free, At Any Time. And any law that says otherwise is Bullshit, and needs to be opposed until removed. End of.
Posted at 21:19 on Saturday, June 12, 2010